Check report · Shop link

Disguised Alpha

A permanent record of what we could see on 2026-09-17. Share it, cite it, or download it.

Shop link · https://disguisedresearch.shop
Good · 6.7/10Grade CLayer 3 · Research-use-only supplier

US-based domestic peptide vendor offering RUO compounds with third-party testing claims, but lacking visible COA files and legal entity details.

Disguised Alpha offers research peptides, pens, isolates, and oral compounds shipped domestically from Irvine, California. The vendor claims independent third-party batch testing and provides a customer test reimbursement program. However, legal business entity details, a physical address, and direct access to COA files are missing from the fetched pages.

Confidence: high · 4 pages read · 1 document opened · 2026-09-17 08:56 UTC

We could read most of what matters, lab evidence included.

Good. Above the median of the 125 research suppliers we have scored (6.0).

How to read this score
05.06.58.010
  • Strong8.0 – 10
  • Good6.5 – 7.9
  • Mixed5.0 – 6.4
  • Weak0 – 4.9
Against the research-supplier pool: median 6.0, lower quarter below 4.3, top quarter above 8.1, from 125 scored checks. This one is 6.7 Above the median of the 125 research suppliers we have scored (6.0). The dashed line marks the median.
What to look at before you buy
  1. 1The site lacks a physical business address and lists incomplete contact phone details.
  2. 2Certificates of analysis were not accessible on the fetched COA portal page for independent review.
How the score is built

Third-party test reports: are they recent, lot-linked, and do they use methods that can actually prove identity and amount?

  • Published test reportsClear

    1 of 1 document link we tried opened publicly.

  • Reports tied to a lotFlagged

    The reports we saw are not tied to a lot or batch, so they cannot tell you about the specific vial you would receive.

  • What the reports sayFlagged

    The text mentions third-party testing through independent labs (naming Janoshik, ILS, Chromate, Freedom, and Vanguard in their testing reimbursement policy), but no specific certificates of analysis were displayed on the COA page.

  • Analytical methodNot visible

    The seller claims HPLC purity verification along with identity, sterility, endotoxin, and heavy-metals testing, but specific methodology details are not viewable on the COA portal page.

  • Named third-party labClear

    The site names an outside lab we recognise: janoshik.

  • Document recencyNot visible

    The documents carry no date we could read from the server.

Certificates we opened
  • View COA portal

    Opened publicly, contents not readable. No lot or batch reference.

    The link returns text/html; charset=UTF-8 rather than a document file. Nothing in the link or its label ties this report to a specific lot or batch.

Social proof evidence
Weak signal · 12% of the score

Third-party ratings and public threads, read directly at the moment of this check. They are easy to buy and easy to brigade, so they are weighted low and can never overturn a lab-evidence flag. Every source below is also logged in the evidence trail.

Audit log — what we consulted

Every claim in this report traces to one of the items above. Expand a row to see the material it is based on.

Confidence breakdown

The score is a weighted mean over the pillars we could actually read — 88% of the model on this run. Anything we could not see is left out of the maths rather than counted against the seller.

Lab evidence1.93 of 6.7 points · 39% of this score

Model weight 34% · pillar score 5.0/10 · 2 ok, 2 flagged, 2 unseen

Company reality1.83 of 6.7 points · 27% of this score

Model weight 24% · pillar score 6.7/10 · 4 ok, 2 flagged, 1 unseen

Handling standards2.05 of 6.7 points · 20% of this score

Model weight 18% · pillar score 10.0/10 · 1 ok, 0 flagged, 2 unseen

Shipping and storage0.91 of 6.7 points · 14% of this score

Model weight 12% · pillar score 6.7/10 · 2 ok, 1 flagged, 0 unseen

Third-party reputationnot visible · excluded

Model weight 12% · nothing readable · 0 ok, 0 flagged, 3 unseen

Inside the reputation pillar (12% of the model)

Reputation is deliberately the lightest pillar. Even a perfect rating cannot lift a report over a lab-evidence flag.

Cite this check

Paste the citation straight into a paper or a reference manager. Both files carry the run identifier and the timestamp of this report.

MyDosage. MyDosage supply check: Disguised Alpha (6.7/10). 2026-09-17. https://mydosage.com/c/d81197da-4552-4baa-a184-9403ac57ce65
Take the whole file with you

The pack is one PDF: the verdict page plus an appendix of every cited page, document and social-proof source with the text we read. The data exports carry the same thing in machine form — inputs, every source with its timestamp and confidence weight, and the full scoring breakdown.

Citable PDF
XRedditWhatsAppLinkedInTelegram Email One permanent link, tagged per channel