Pepteria Laboratories
A permanent record of what we could see on 2026-10-08. Share it, cite it, or download it.
Estonian entity with COA library search portal; no reports directly visible
Pepteria Laboratories publishes corporate details naming Research STEM OÜ in Tallinn, Estonia, alongside contact email addresses. The site hosts an online catalogue with a COA search library, but no specific independent testing certificates or lab names were visible to review. Descriptions claim HPLC and mass spectrometry verification while also discussing physical injection effects alongside research-only disclaimers.
Confidence: high · 9 pages read · 1 document opened · 2026-10-08 07:04 UTC
We could read most of what matters, lab evidence included.
Strong. Top quarter of the 132 research suppliers we have scored (median 6.1).
- Strong8.0 – 10
- Good6.5 – 7.9
- Mixed5.0 – 6.4
- Weak0 – 4.9
- 1Certificates of analysis require product or batch search and were not directly readable.
- 2The store references human administration effects despite a research use only disclaimer.
Third-party test reports: are they recent, lot-linked, and do they use methods that can actually prove identity and amount?
- Published test reportsClear
1 of 1 certificate link opened publicly, but we could not read their contents.
- Reports tied to a lotFlagged
The reports we saw are not tied to a lot or batch, so they cannot tell you about the specific vial you would receive.
- What the reports sayNot visible
Claims independent analytical batch testing via a searchable COA library, but no specific testing lab name or third-party report was visible.
- Analytical methodNot visible
Mentions HPLC and mass spectrometry testing, but specific method sheets or protocols are not displayed.
- Named third-party labNot visible
No outside laboratory is named. In-house numbers are not independent evidence.
- Document recencyNot visible
The documents carry no date we could read.
- COA Library
Opened publicly, contents not readable. No lot or batch reference.
The link returns text/html; charset=utf-8 rather than a certificate file we can read.
Third-party ratings and public threads, read directly at the moment of this check. They are easy to buy and easy to brigade, so they are weighted low and can never overturn a lab-evidence flag. Every source below is also logged in the evidence trail.
Trustpilot did not answer, so we treat their reputation there as not visible.
Read 2026-10-08 07:04 UTC
No Google rating we could read from here. Google blocks automated reads, so open the link and judge it yourself.
Read 2026-10-08 07:04 UTC
No public community discussion we could read. Silence is not a verdict either way.
Read 2026-10-08 07:04 UTC
Every claim in this report traces to one of the items above. Expand a row to see the material it is based on.
The score is a weighted mean over the pillars we could actually read — 88% of the model on this run. Anything we could not see is left out of the maths rather than counted against the seller.
Model weight 34% · pillar score 5.0/10 · 1 ok, 1 flagged, 4 unseen
Model weight 24% · pillar score 10.0/10 · 5 ok, 0 flagged, 2 unseen
Model weight 18% · pillar score 10.0/10 · 1 ok, 0 flagged, 2 unseen
Model weight 12% · pillar score 10.0/10 · 1 ok, 0 flagged, 2 unseen
Model weight 12% · nothing readable · 0 ok, 0 flagged, 3 unseen
Reputation is deliberately the lightest pillar. Even a perfect rating cannot lift a report over a lab-evidence flag.
Paste the citation straight into a paper or a reference manager. Both files carry the run identifier and the timestamp of this report.
MyDosage. MyDosage supply check: Pepteria Laboratories (8.1/10). 2026-10-08. https://mydosage.com/c/b6941b93-f869-4981-a8c2-352277fb1e84
The pack is one PDF: the verdict page plus an appendix of every cited page, document and social-proof source with the text we read. The data exports carry the same thing in machine form — inputs, every source with its timestamp and confidence weight, and the full scoring breakdown.
Whatever this report said, there are three ways to get what you need.
- 1Doctor + approved medicineA prescription and a pharmacy-dispensed product with a regulator's label.
- 2Clinic + licensed compounding pharmacyA prescriber and a pharmacy we checked against its licence register.
- 3Research-use-only supplierNo medical oversight. Only worth it when nothing approved exists yet.
Prices, oversight and typical wait are compared side by side for United States.