Check report · Shop link

PSPeptides

A permanent record of what we could see on 2026-08-28. Share it, cite it, or download it.

Shop link · pspeptides.com
Strong · 8.3/10Grade BLayer 3 · Research-use-only supplier

PSPeptides provides third-party COA links, clear business entity details, and research-only disclaimers.

PSPeptides is operated by ProSupply Services LLC in New Jersey. The site sells research peptides labeled strictly for laboratory use. They host a dedicated certifications page with batch-specific COA links covering purity, endotoxins, and heavy metals. Their terms outline clear policies regarding fulfillment, defective items, and independent lab re-testing claims.

Confidence: high · 7 pages read · 1 document opened · 2026-08-28 13:48 UTC

We could read most of what matters, lab evidence included.

Strong. Top quarter of the 31 research suppliers we have scored (median 6.7).

How to read this score
05.06.58.010
  • Strong8.0 – 10
  • Good6.5 – 7.9
  • Mixed5.0 – 6.4
  • Weak0 – 4.9
Against the research-supplier pool: median 6.7, lower quarter below 4.8, top quarter above 8.0, from 31 scored checks. This one is 8.3 Top quarter of the 31 research suppliers we have scored (median 6.7). The dashed line marks the median.
What to look at before you buy
  1. 1Certificates of Analysis link to external pages that were not fully detailed in the provided text; verify the testing lab name and specific lot data on the certification files before purchase.
How the score is built

Third-party test reports: are they recent, lot-linked, and do they use methods that can actually prove identity and amount?

  • Published test reportsClear

    1 of 1 document link we tried opened publicly.

  • Reports tied to a lotFlagged

    The reports we saw are not tied to a lot or batch, so they cannot tell you about the specific vial you would receive.

  • What the reports sayClear

    Mentions independent third-party testing with a dedicated certifications page listing COAs, heavy metals, and endotoxin reports, but specific lab names are omitted in text.

  • Analytical methodNot visible

    Claims HPLC, mass spectrometry, heavy metals, and endotoxin testing on product pages, but specific lab methodology details require reviewing individual COA files.

  • Named third-party labNot visible

    No outside laboratory is named. In-house numbers are not independent evidence.

  • Document recencyNot visible

    The documents carry no date we could read from the server.

Documents we tried to open
  • Test Reports/Certificates

    Opened publicly. No lot or batch reference.

    The link returns text/html; charset=UTF-8 rather than a document file. Nothing in the link or its label ties this report to a specific lot or batch.

Social proof evidence
Weak signal · 12% of the score

Third-party ratings and public threads, read directly at the moment of this check. They are easy to buy and easy to brigade, so they are weighted low and can never overturn a lab-evidence flag. Every source below is also logged in the evidence trail.

Audit log — what we consulted

Every claim in this report traces to one of the items above. Expand a row to see the material it is based on.

Confidence breakdown

The score is a weighted mean over the pillars we could actually read — 88% of the model on this run. Anything we could not see is left out of the maths rather than counted against the seller.

Lab evidence2.59 of 8.3 points · 39% of this score

Model weight 34% · pillar score 6.7/10 · 2 ok, 1 flagged, 3 unseen

Company reality2.73 of 8.3 points · 27% of this score

Model weight 24% · pillar score 10.0/10 · 6 ok, 0 flagged, 1 unseen

Handling standards2.05 of 8.3 points · 20% of this score

Model weight 18% · pillar score 10.0/10 · 2 ok, 0 flagged, 1 unseen

Shipping and storage0.91 of 8.3 points · 14% of this score

Model weight 12% · pillar score 6.7/10 · 2 ok, 1 flagged, 0 unseen

Third-party reputationnot visible · excluded

Model weight 12% · nothing readable · 0 ok, 0 flagged, 3 unseen

Inside the reputation pillar (12% of the model)

Reputation is deliberately the lightest pillar. Even a perfect rating cannot lift a report over a lab-evidence flag.

Cite this check

Paste the citation straight into a paper or a reference manager. Both files carry the run identifier and the timestamp of this report.

MyDosage. MyDosage supply check: PSPeptides (8.3/10). 2026-08-28. https://mydosage.com/c/3d980e01-73be-465c-83f5-dd3bd993f457
Take the whole file with you

The pack is one PDF: the verdict page plus an appendix of every cited page, document and social-proof source with the text we read. The data exports carry the same thing in machine form — inputs, every source with its timestamp and confidence weight, and the full scoring breakdown.

Citable PDF
XRedditWhatsAppLinkedInTelegram Email One permanent link, tagged per channel